pysec-2021-62
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2021-01-11 16:15
Modified
2021-01-19 21:48
Details
python-cryptography 3.2 is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing attacks in the RSA decryption API, via timed processing of valid PKCS#1 v1.5 ciphertext.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
cryptography | pkg:pypi/cryptography |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "cryptography", purl: "pkg:pypi/cryptography", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "3.2.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "0.1", "0.2", "0.2.1", "0.2.2", "0.3", "0.4", "0.5", "0.5.1", "0.5.2", "0.5.3", "0.5.4", "0.6", "0.6.1", "0.7", "0.7.1", "0.7.2", "0.8", "0.8.1", "0.8.2", "0.9", "0.9.1", "0.9.2", "0.9.3", "1.0", "1.0.1", "1.0.2", "1.1", "1.1.1", "1.1.2", "1.2", "1.2.1", "1.2.2", "1.2.3", "1.3", "1.3.1", "1.3.2", "1.3.3", "1.3.4", "1.4", "1.5", "1.5.1", "1.5.2", "1.5.3", "1.6", "1.7", "1.7.1", "1.7.2", "1.8", "1.8.1", "1.8.2", "1.9", "2.0", "2.0.1", "2.0.2", "2.0.3", "2.1", "2.1.1", "2.1.2", "2.1.3", "2.1.4", "2.2", "2.2.1", "2.2.2", "2.3", "2.3.1", "2.4", "2.4.1", "2.4.2", "2.5", "2.6", "2.6.1", "2.7", "2.8", "2.9", "2.9.1", "2.9.2", "3.0", "3.1", "3.1.1", "3.2", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-25659", "GHSA-hggm-jpg3-v476", ], details: "python-cryptography 3.2 is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing attacks in the RSA decryption API, via timed processing of valid PKCS#1 v1.5 ciphertext.", id: "PYSEC-2021-62", modified: "2021-01-19T21:48:00Z", published: "2021-01-11T16:15:00Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/5507/commits/ce1bef6f1ee06ac497ca0c837fbd1c7ef6c2472b", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hggm-jpg3-v476", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.