PYSEC-2021-450

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-05-14 20:15 - Updated: 2021-12-09 06:34
VLAI?
Details

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackprop* operations fail to validate that the input tensors are not empty. In turn, this would result in a division by 0. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/a91bb59769f19146d5a0c20060244378e878f140/tensorflow/core/kernels/conv_grad_ops_3d.cc#L430-L450) does not check that the divisor used in computing the shard size is not zero. Thus, if attacker controls the input sizes, they can trigger a denial of service via a division by zero error. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

Impacted products
Name purl
tensorflow-cpu pkg:pypi/tensorflow-cpu

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-cpu",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow-cpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "311403edbc9816df80274bd1ea8b3c0c0f22c3fa"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.3"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.3"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.15.0",
        "2.1.0",
        "2.1.1",
        "2.1.2",
        "2.1.3",
        "2.2.0",
        "2.2.1",
        "2.2.2",
        "2.3.0",
        "2.3.1",
        "2.3.2",
        "2.4.0",
        "2.4.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-29522",
    "GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv"
  ],
  "details": "TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The `tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackprop*` operations fail to validate that the input tensors are not empty. In turn, this would result in a division by 0. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/a91bb59769f19146d5a0c20060244378e878f140/tensorflow/core/kernels/conv_grad_ops_3d.cc#L430-L450) does not check that the divisor used in computing the shard size is not zero. Thus, if attacker controls the input sizes, they can trigger a denial of service via a division by zero error. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2021-450",
  "modified": "2021-12-09T06:34:46.764419Z",
  "published": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/311403edbc9816df80274bd1ea8b3c0c0f22c3fa"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…