PYSEC-2021-33

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-02-05 18:15 - Updated: 2021-02-08 20:54
VLAI?
Details

LinkedIn Oncall through 1.4.0 allows reflected XSS via /query because of mishandling of the "No results found for" message in the search bar.

Impacted products
Name purl
oncall pkg:pypi/oncall

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "oncall",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/oncall"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.1.2",
        "1.1.3",
        "1.1.4",
        "1.1.5",
        "1.1.7",
        "1.1.8",
        "1.1.9",
        "1.1.10",
        "1.2.0",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.2.2",
        "1.2.3",
        "1.2.4",
        "1.3.4",
        "1.3.5",
        "1.3.6",
        "1.3.7",
        "1.3.8",
        "1.3.9",
        "1.4.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-26722",
    "GHSA-rfw2-x9f8-2f6m"
  ],
  "details": "LinkedIn Oncall through 1.4.0 allows reflected XSS via /query because of mishandling of the \"No results found for\" message in the search bar.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2021-33",
  "modified": "2021-02-08T20:54:00Z",
  "published": "2021-02-05T18:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/linkedin/oncall/issues/341"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rfw2-x9f8-2f6m"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…