pysec-2021-204
Vulnerability from pysec
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Due to lack of validation in tf.raw_ops.SparseDenseCwiseMul
, an attacker can trigger denial of service via CHECK
-fails or accesses to outside the bounds of heap allocated data. Since the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/38178a2f7a681a7835bb0912702a134bfe3b4d84/tensorflow/core/kernels/sparse_dense_binary_op_shared.cc#L68-L80) only validates the rank of the input arguments but no constraints between dimensions(https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/raw_ops/SparseDenseCwiseMul), an attacker can abuse them to trigger internal CHECK
assertions (and cause program termination, denial of service) or to write to memory outside of bounds of heap allocated tensor buffers. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow", "purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "7ae2af34087fb4b5c8915279efd03da3b81028bc" } ], "repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow", "type": "GIT" }, { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.4" }, { "introduced": "2.2.0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.3" }, { "introduced": "2.3.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.3" }, { "introduced": "2.4.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.12.0", "0.12.0rc0", "0.12.0rc1", "0.12.1", "1.0.0", "1.0.1", "1.1.0", "1.1.0rc0", "1.1.0rc1", "1.1.0rc2", "1.10.0", "1.10.0rc0", "1.10.0rc1", "1.10.1", "1.11.0", "1.11.0rc0", "1.11.0rc1", "1.11.0rc2", "1.12.0", "1.12.0rc0", "1.12.0rc1", "1.12.0rc2", "1.12.2", "1.12.3", "1.13.0rc0", "1.13.0rc1", "1.13.0rc2", "1.13.1", "1.13.2", "1.14.0", "1.14.0rc0", "1.14.0rc1", "1.15.0", "1.15.0rc0", "1.15.0rc1", "1.15.0rc2", "1.15.0rc3", "1.15.2", "1.15.3", "1.15.4", "1.15.5", "1.2.0", "1.2.0rc0", "1.2.0rc1", "1.2.0rc2", "1.2.1", "1.3.0", "1.3.0rc0", "1.3.0rc1", "1.3.0rc2", "1.4.0", "1.4.0rc0", "1.4.0rc1", "1.4.1", "1.5.0", "1.5.0rc0", "1.5.0rc1", "1.5.1", "1.6.0", "1.6.0rc0", "1.6.0rc1", "1.7.0", "1.7.0rc0", "1.7.0rc1", "1.7.1", "1.8.0", "1.8.0rc0", "1.8.0rc1", "1.9.0", "1.9.0rc0", "1.9.0rc1", "1.9.0rc2", "2.0.0", "2.0.0a0", "2.0.0b0", "2.0.0b1", "2.0.0rc0", "2.0.0rc1", "2.0.0rc2", "2.0.1", "2.0.2", "2.0.3", "2.0.4", "2.1.0", "2.1.0rc0", "2.1.0rc1", "2.1.0rc2", "2.1.1", "2.1.2", "2.1.3", "2.2.0", "2.2.1", "2.2.2", "2.3.0", "2.3.1", "2.3.2", "2.4.0", "2.4.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-29567", "GHSA-wp3c-xw9g-gpcg" ], "details": "TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Due to lack of validation in `tf.raw_ops.SparseDenseCwiseMul`, an attacker can trigger denial of service via `CHECK`-fails or accesses to outside the bounds of heap allocated data. Since the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/38178a2f7a681a7835bb0912702a134bfe3b4d84/tensorflow/core/kernels/sparse_dense_binary_op_shared.cc#L68-L80) only validates the rank of the input arguments but no constraints between dimensions(https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/raw_ops/SparseDenseCwiseMul), an attacker can abuse them to trigger internal `CHECK` assertions (and cause program termination, denial of service) or to write to memory outside of bounds of heap allocated tensor buffers. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.", "id": "PYSEC-2021-204", "modified": "2021-08-27T03:22:33.334705Z", "published": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-wp3c-xw9g-gpcg" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/7ae2af34087fb4b5c8915279efd03da3b81028bc" } ] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.