pysec-2021-2
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2021-02-17 15:15
Modified
2021-02-23 17:48
Details
Improper Access Control on Configurations Endpoint for the Stable API of Apache Airflow allows users with Viewer or User role to get Airflow Configurations including sensitive information even when [webserver] expose_config
is set to False
in airflow.cfg
. This allowed a privilege escalation attack. This issue affects Apache Airflow 2.0.0.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
apache-airflow | pkg:pypi/apache-airflow |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "apache-airflow", purl: "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "2.0.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "1.8.1", "1.8.2rc1", "1.8.2", "1.9.0", "1.10.0", "1.10.1b1", "1.10.1rc2", "1.10.1", "1.10.2b2", "1.10.2rc1", "1.10.2rc2", "1.10.2rc3", "1.10.2", "1.10.3b1", "1.10.3b2", "1.10.3rc1", "1.10.3rc2", "1.10.3", "1.10.4b2", "1.10.4rc1", "1.10.4rc2", "1.10.4rc3", "1.10.4rc4", "1.10.4rc5", "1.10.4", "1.10.5rc1", "1.10.5", "1.10.6rc1", "1.10.6rc2", "1.10.6", "1.10.7rc1", "1.10.7rc2", "1.10.7rc3", "1.10.7", "1.10.8rc1", "1.10.8", "1.10.9rc1", "1.10.9", "1.10.10rc1", "1.10.10rc2", "1.10.10rc3", "1.10.10rc4", "1.10.10rc5", "1.10.10", "1.10.11rc1", "1.10.11rc2", "1.10.11", "1.10.12rc1", "1.10.12rc2", "1.10.12rc3", "1.10.12rc4", "1.10.12", "1.10.13rc1", "1.10.13", "1.10.14rc1", "1.10.14rc2", "1.10.14rc3", "1.10.14rc4", "1.10.14", "1.10.15rc1", "1.10.15", "2.0.0b1", "2.0.0b2", "2.0.0b3", "2.0.0rc1", "2.0.0rc2", "2.0.0rc3", "2.0.0", "2.0.1rc1", "2.0.1rc2", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-26559", "GHSA-ffw3-6mp6-jmvj", ], details: "Improper Access Control on Configurations Endpoint for the Stable API of Apache Airflow allows users with Viewer or User role to get Airflow Configurations including sensitive information even when `[webserver] expose_config` is set to `False` in `airflow.cfg`. This allowed a privilege escalation attack. This issue affects Apache Airflow 2.0.0.", id: "PYSEC-2021-2", modified: "2021-02-23T17:48:00Z", published: "2021-02-17T15:15:00Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3b3787700279ec361308cbefb7c2cce2acb26891a12ce864e4a13c8d%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/17/1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd142565996d7ee847b9c14b8a9921dcf80bc6bc160e3d9dca6dfc2f8@%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-ffw3-6mp6-jmvj", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.