pysec-2020-315
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2020-09-25 19:15
Modified
2021-12-09 06:35
Details

In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the RaggedCountSparseOutput implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the splits tensor generate a valid partitioning of the values tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A BatchedMap is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of splits_values is not 0, batch_idx will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in per_batch_counts. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.

Aliases


To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.12.0",
        "0.12.1",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.1.0",
        "1.10.0",
        "1.10.1",
        "1.11.0",
        "1.12.0",
        "1.12.2",
        "1.12.3",
        "1.13.1",
        "1.13.2",
        "1.14.0",
        "1.15.0",
        "1.15.2",
        "1.15.3",
        "1.15.4",
        "1.15.5",
        "1.2.0",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.3.0",
        "1.4.0",
        "1.4.1",
        "1.5.0",
        "1.5.1",
        "1.6.0",
        "1.7.0",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.8.0",
        "1.9.0",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.0.1",
        "2.0.2",
        "2.0.3",
        "2.0.4",
        "2.1.0",
        "2.1.1",
        "2.1.2",
        "2.1.3",
        "2.1.4",
        "2.2.0",
        "2.2.1",
        "2.2.2",
        "2.2.3",
        "2.3.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15200",
    "GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3"
  ],
  "details": "In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2020-315",
  "modified": "2021-12-09T06:35:13.201827Z",
  "published": "2020-09-25T19:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.