pysec-2018-124
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2018-02-12 22:29
Modified
2024-11-21 14:22
Severity ?
Details
In Exiv2 0.26, there is an integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::getULong function in types.cpp. Remote attackers can exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted image file. Note that this vulnerability is different from CVE-2017-14864, which is an invalid memory address dereference.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | exiv2 | pkg:pypi/exiv2 |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "exiv2",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/exiv2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1",
"0.11.0",
"0.11.1",
"0.11.2",
"0.11.3",
"0.12.0",
"0.12.1",
"0.13.0",
"0.13.1",
"0.13.2",
"0.14.0",
"0.14.1",
"0.15.0",
"0.16.0",
"0.16.1",
"0.16.2",
"0.16.2.post1",
"0.16.3",
"0.16.3.post1",
"0.17.0",
"0.17.1",
"0.2",
"0.3",
"0.3.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-17725"
],
"details": "In Exiv2 0.26, there is an integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::getULong function in types.cpp. Remote attackers can exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted image file. Note that this vulnerability is different from CVE-2017-14864, which is an invalid memory address dereference.",
"id": "PYSEC-2018-124",
"modified": "2024-11-21T14:22:47.758262Z",
"published": "2018-02-12T22:29:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "EVIDENCE",
"url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/188"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/188"
},
{
"type": "EVIDENCE",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525055"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525055"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"withdrawn": "2024-11-22T04:37:04Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…