pysec-2018-117
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2018-12-12 10:29
Modified
2024-01-02 15:20
Severity ?
Details
There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::tEXtToDataBuf function of pngimage.cpp in Exiv2 0.27-RC3. A crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service attack.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
exiv2 | pkg:pypi/exiv2 |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "exiv2", purl: "pkg:pypi/exiv2", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "0.1", "0.11.0", "0.11.1", "0.11.2", "0.11.3", "0.12.0", "0.12.1", "0.13.0", "0.13.1", "0.13.2", "0.14.0", "0.14.1", "0.2", "0.3", "0.3.1", "0.15.0", "0.16.0", "0.16.1", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-20096", ], details: "There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::tEXtToDataBuf function of pngimage.cpp in Exiv2 0.27-RC3. A crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service attack.", id: "PYSEC-2018-117", modified: "2024-01-02T15:20:59.143416Z", published: "2018-12-12T10:29:00Z", references: [ { type: "EVIDENCE", url: "https://github.com/TeamSeri0us/pocs/tree/master/exiv2/20181206", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/TeamSeri0us/pocs/tree/master/exiv2/20181206", }, { type: "REPORT", url: "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/590", }, { type: "EVIDENCE", url: "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/590", }, { type: "FIX", url: "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/590", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2101", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZXCEKTYF7HLM6VH2WCWO2HXTJH37MBLA/", }, ], severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.