pysec-2014-77
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2014-10-25 22:55
Modified
2021-08-27 03:21
Details
Bottle 0.10.x before 0.10.12, 0.11.x before 0.11.7, and 0.12.x before 0.12.6 does not properly limit content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via an accepted Content-Type followed by a ; (semi-colon) and a Content-Type that would not be accepted, as demonstrated in YouCompleteMe to execute arbitrary code.
Impacted products
Name | purl | bottle | pkg:pypi/bottle |
---|
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "bottle", "purl": "pkg:pypi/bottle" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0.8" }, { "fixed": "0.10.12" }, { "introduced": "0.11" }, { "fixed": "0.11.7" }, { "introduced": "0.12" }, { "fixed": "0.12.6" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.10.1", "0.10.10", "0.10.11", "0.10.2", "0.10.3", "0.10.4", "0.10.5", "0.10.6", "0.10.7", "0.10.8", "0.10.9", "0.11.1", "0.11.2", "0.11.3", "0.11.4", "0.11.5", "0.11.6", "0.12.1", "0.12.2", "0.12.3", "0.12.4", "0.12.5", "0.8.1", "0.8.2", "0.8.3", "0.8.4", "0.8.5", "0.9.1", "0.9.2", "0.9.3", "0.9.4", "0.9.5", "0.9.6", "0.9.7", "0.9.8" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-3137" ], "details": "Bottle 0.10.x before 0.10.12, 0.11.x before 0.11.7, and 0.12.x before 0.12.6 does not properly limit content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via an accepted Content-Type followed by a ; (semi-colon) and a Content-Type that would not be accepted, as demonstrated in YouCompleteMe to execute arbitrary code.", "id": "PYSEC-2014-77", "modified": "2021-08-27T03:21:56.361083Z", "published": "2014-10-25T22:55:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://github.com/defnull/bottle/issues/616" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093255" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/05/01/15" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2948" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…