osv-2025-491
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2025-06-27 00:16
Modified
2025-06-27 00:16
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in libssl.soNUMBER
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=427814448

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 5
Crash state:
libssl.soNUMBER
libssl.soNUMBER
SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "MEDIUM"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "sudoers",
        "purl": "pkg:generic/sudoers"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "978aa90021c439235a504b2405d0d6ca2cb15c1c"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "SUDO_1_9_1",
        "SUDO_1_9_10",
        "SUDO_1_9_11",
        "SUDO_1_9_11p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_11p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_11p3",
        "SUDO_1_9_12",
        "SUDO_1_9_12p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_12p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_13",
        "SUDO_1_9_13p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_13p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_13p3",
        "SUDO_1_9_14",
        "SUDO_1_9_14p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_14p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_14p3",
        "SUDO_1_9_15",
        "SUDO_1_9_15p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_15p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_15p3",
        "SUDO_1_9_15p4",
        "SUDO_1_9_15p5",
        "SUDO_1_9_16",
        "SUDO_1_9_16p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_16p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_2",
        "SUDO_1_9_3",
        "SUDO_1_9_3p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_4",
        "SUDO_1_9_4p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_4p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_5",
        "SUDO_1_9_5p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_5p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_6",
        "SUDO_1_9_6p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_7",
        "SUDO_1_9_7p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_7p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_8",
        "SUDO_1_9_8p1",
        "SUDO_1_9_8p2",
        "SUDO_1_9_9",
        "v1.9.1",
        "v1.9.10",
        "v1.9.11",
        "v1.9.11p1",
        "v1.9.11p2",
        "v1.9.11p3",
        "v1.9.12",
        "v1.9.12p1",
        "v1.9.12p2",
        "v1.9.13",
        "v1.9.13p1",
        "v1.9.13p2",
        "v1.9.13p3",
        "v1.9.14",
        "v1.9.14p1",
        "v1.9.14p2",
        "v1.9.14p3",
        "v1.9.15",
        "v1.9.15p1",
        "v1.9.15p2",
        "v1.9.15p3",
        "v1.9.15p4",
        "v1.9.15p5",
        "v1.9.16",
        "v1.9.16p1",
        "v1.9.16p2",
        "v1.9.17",
        "v1.9.2",
        "v1.9.3",
        "v1.9.3p1",
        "v1.9.4",
        "v1.9.4p1",
        "v1.9.4p2",
        "v1.9.5",
        "v1.9.5p1",
        "v1.9.5p2",
        "v1.9.6",
        "v1.9.6p1",
        "v1.9.7",
        "v1.9.7p1",
        "v1.9.7p2",
        "v1.9.8",
        "v1.9.8p1",
        "v1.9.8p2",
        "v1.9.9"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=427814448\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 5\nCrash state:\nlibssl.soNUMBER\nlibssl.soNUMBER\nSSL_CTX_set_cipher_list\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2025-491",
  "modified": "2025-06-27T00:16:09.822510Z",
  "published": "2025-06-27T00:16:09.822144Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=427814448"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in libssl.soNUMBER"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.