osv-2021-40
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-01-11 00:00
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in rijndaelDecrypt
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29454

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1
Crash state:
rijndaelDecrypt
aes_256cbc_decrypt
check_user_password
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "MEDIUM"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "clamav"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9b9999d7785ece58c9f4703542e6d877d21910c4"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7a70a03ba01d657296be61f0ec98ca6990f51578"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "b2337b87634f0cc41f4b789150ba1c6d2f22a51c"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-devel.git",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "clamav-0.103.0",
        "clamav-0.103.0-rc",
        "clamav-0.103.0-rc2",
        "clamav-0.103.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29454\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1\nCrash state:\nrijndaelDecrypt\naes_256cbc_decrypt\ncheck_user_password\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2021-40",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:39.391446Z",
  "published": "2021-01-11T00:00:20.242219Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29454"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in rijndaelDecrypt"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.