jvndb-2011-000014
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2011-02-28 17:17
Modified
2011-02-28 17:17
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
SEIL Series routers vulnerable to buffer overflow
Details
SEIL Series routers contain a buffer overflow vulnerability. The PPP Access Concentrator (PPPAC) contained in SEIL Series routers contain a buffer overflow vulnerability when processing PPPoE packets.
References
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000014.html",
  "dc:date": "2011-02-28T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2011-02-28T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2011-02-28T17:17+09:00",
  "description": "SEIL Series routers contain a buffer overflow vulnerability.\r\n\r\nThe PPP Access Concentrator (PPPAC) contained in SEIL Series routers contain a buffer overflow vulnerability when processing PPPoE packets.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000014.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fb1_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/B1 firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fneu_2fe_plus_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/neu 2FE Plus firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fturbo_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/Turbo firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fx1_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/X1 firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fx2_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/X2 firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:iij:seil%252fx86_firmware",
      "@product": "SEIL/x86 firmware",
      "@vendor": "Internet Initiative Japan Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "8.3",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2011-000014",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN88991166",
      "@id": "JVN#88991166",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0454",
      "@id": "CVE-2011-0454",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-0454",
      "@id": "CVE-2011-0454",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.ipa.go.jp/security/english/vuln/201102_SEIL_en.html",
      "@id": "Security Alert for Vulnerability in SEIL Series Products",
      "@source": "IPA SECURITY ALERTS"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43494",
      "@id": "SA43494",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46598",
      "@id": "46598",
      "@source": "BID"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/65672",
      "@id": "65672",
      "@source": "XF"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-119",
      "@title": "Buffer Errors(CWE-119)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "SEIL Series routers vulnerable to buffer overflow"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.