jvndb-2009-000065
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2009-10-02 16:02
Modified
2009-10-02 16:02
Summary
SugarCRM vulnerable to cross-site scripting
Details
SugarCRM contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
SugarCRM is a customer relationship management (CRM) software. SugarCRM contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Takeshi Terada of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
| Type | URL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000065.html",
"dc:date": "2009-10-02T16:02+09:00",
"dcterms:issued": "2009-10-02T16:02+09:00",
"dcterms:modified": "2009-10-02T16:02+09:00",
"description": "SugarCRM contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nSugarCRM is a customer relationship management (CRM) software. SugarCRM contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nTakeshi Terada of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
"link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000065.html",
"sec:cpe": {
"#text": "cpe:/a:sugarcrm:sugarcrm",
"@product": "SugarCRM",
"@vendor": "SugarCRM",
"@version": "2.2"
},
"sec:cvss": {
"@score": "2.6",
"@severity": "Low",
"@type": "Base",
"@vector": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"@version": "2.0"
},
"sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2009-000065",
"sec:references": [
{
"#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN84396512/index.html",
"@id": "JVN#84396512",
"@source": "JVN"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
"@id": "CWE-79",
"@title": "Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79)"
}
],
"title": "SugarCRM vulnerable to cross-site scripting"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…