jvndb-2006-000858
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Ruby vulnerability caused by a problem with the alias funtion so that safe level 4 does not function as a sandbox
Details
Safe levels exist as a part of the Ruby language security model, in order to limit the operation of untrusted objects. Ruby contains a vulnerability which may allow an attacker to bypass the safe level restrictions and execute normally inaccessible methods, due to a problem in Ruby's alias function.
Show details on JVN DB website


{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000858.html",
   "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   description: "Safe levels exist as a part of the Ruby language security model, in order to limit the operation of untrusted objects. Ruby contains a vulnerability which may allow an attacker to bypass the safe level restrictions and execute normally inaccessible methods, due to a problem in Ruby's alias function.",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000858.html",
   "sec:cpe": [
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:ruby-lang:ruby",
         "@product": "Ruby",
         "@vendor": "Ruby",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:misc:miraclelinux_asianux_server",
         "@product": "Asianux Server",
         "@vendor": "Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux",
         "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
   ],
   "sec:cvss": {
      "@score": "1.2",
      "@severity": "Low",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
      "@version": "2.0",
   },
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2006-000858",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83768862/index.html",
         "@id": "JVN#83768862",
         "@source": "JVN",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694",
         "@id": "CVE-2006-3694",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3694",
         "@id": "CVE-2006-3694",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21009/",
         "@id": "SA21009",
         "@source": "SECUNIA",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18944",
         "@id": "18944",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/2760",
         "@id": "FrSIRT/ADV-2006-2760",
         "@source": "FRSIRT",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
         "@id": "CWE-DesignError",
         "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-DesignError)",
      },
   ],
   title: "Ruby vulnerability caused by a problem with the alias funtion so that safe level 4 does not function as a sandbox",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.