jvndb-2006-000858
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Ruby vulnerability caused by a problem with the alias funtion so that safe level 4 does not function as a sandbox
Details
Safe levels exist as a part of the Ruby language security model, in order to limit the operation of untrusted objects. Ruby contains a vulnerability which may allow an attacker to bypass the safe level restrictions and execute normally inaccessible methods, due to a problem in Ruby's alias function.
References
JVN http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83768862/index.html
CVE http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694
NVD http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3694
SECUNIA http://secunia.com/advisories/21009/
BID http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18944
FRSIRT http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/2760
No Mapping(CWE-DesignError) https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html
Impacted products
RubyRuby
Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.Asianux Server
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000858.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "Safe levels exist as a part of the Ruby language security model, in order to limit the operation of untrusted objects. Ruby contains a vulnerability which may allow an attacker to bypass the safe level restrictions and execute normally inaccessible methods, due to a problem in Ruby\u0027s alias function.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000858.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:ruby-lang:ruby",
      "@product": "Ruby",
      "@vendor": "Ruby",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:misc:miraclelinux_asianux_server",
      "@product": "Asianux Server",
      "@vendor": "Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux",
      "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux",
      "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "1.2",
    "@severity": "Low",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2006-000858",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83768862/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#83768862",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694",
      "@id": "CVE-2006-3694",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3694",
      "@id": "CVE-2006-3694",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21009/",
      "@id": "SA21009",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18944",
      "@id": "18944",
      "@source": "BID"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/2760",
      "@id": "FrSIRT/ADV-2006-2760",
      "@source": "FRSIRT"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-DesignError",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-DesignError)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Ruby vulnerability caused by a problem with the alias funtion so that safe level 4 does not function as a sandbox"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.