jvndb-2004-000195
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
LHA Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability with Shell Metacharacter in Directory Name
Details
LHA is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution due to improper handling of directory names cantaining shell metacharacters.
References
CVE http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-0745
NVD http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-0745
BID http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11093
XF http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/17198
Impacted products
LHa for UNIX projectLHa for UNIX
Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.Asianux Server
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000195.html",
   "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   description: "LHA is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution due to improper handling of directory names cantaining shell metacharacters.",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000195.html",
   "sec:cpe": [
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:lha_for_unix_project:lha_for_unix",
         "@product": "LHa for UNIX",
         "@vendor": "LHa for UNIX project",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:misc:miraclelinux_asianux_server",
         "@product": "Asianux Server",
         "@vendor": "Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux",
         "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop",
         "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux_advanced_workstation",
         "@product": "Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
   ],
   "sec:cvss": {
      "@score": "10.0",
      "@severity": "High",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
      "@version": "2.0",
   },
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2004-000195",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-0745",
         "@id": "CVE-2004-0745",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-0745",
         "@id": "CVE-2004-0745",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11093",
         "@id": "11093",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/17198",
         "@id": "17198",
         "@source": "XF",
      },
   ],
   title: "LHA Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability with Shell Metacharacter in Directory Name",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.