gsd-2024-1554
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-16 06:02
Details
The `fetch()` API and navigation incorrectly shared the same cache, as the cache key did not include the optional headers `fetch()` may contain. Under the correct circumstances, an attacker may have been able to poison the local browser cache by priming it with a `fetch()` response controlled by the additional headers. Upon navigation to the same URL, the user would see the cached response instead of the expected response. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123.
Aliases
{ gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2024-1554", ], details: "The `fetch()` API and navigation incorrectly shared the same cache, as the cache key did not include the optional headers `fetch()` may contain. Under the correct circumstances, an attacker may have been able to poison the local browser cache by priming it with a `fetch()` response controlled by the additional headers. Upon navigation to the same URL, the user would see the cached response instead of the expected response. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123.", id: "GSD-2024-1554", modified: "2024-02-16T06:02:26.032318Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security@mozilla.org", ID: "CVE-2024-1554", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "Firefox", version: { version_data: [ { version_affected: "<", version_name: "unspecified", version_value: "123", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "Mozilla", }, ], }, }, credits: [ { lang: "en", value: "scarlet", }, ], data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "The `fetch()` API and navigation incorrectly shared the same cache, as the cache key did not include the optional headers `fetch()` may contain. Under the correct circumstances, an attacker may have been able to poison the local browser cache by priming it with a `fetch()` response controlled by the additional headers. Upon navigation to the same URL, the user would see the cached response instead of the expected response. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "fetch could be used to effect cache poisoning", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1816390", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1816390", }, { name: "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-05/", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-05/", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { cve: { descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "The `fetch()` API and navigation incorrectly shared the same cache, as the cache key did not include the optional headers `fetch()` may contain. Under the correct circumstances, an attacker may have been able to poison the local browser cache by priming it with a `fetch()` response controlled by the additional headers. Upon navigation to the same URL, the user would see the cached response instead of the expected response. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-1554", lastModified: "2024-02-20T19:50:53.960", metrics: {}, published: "2024-02-20T14:15:08.960", references: [ { source: "security@mozilla.org", url: "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1816390", }, { source: "security@mozilla.org", url: "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-05/", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "security@mozilla.org", vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis", }, }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.