gsd-2022-3204
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
A vulnerability named 'Non-Responsive Delegation Attack' (NRDelegation Attack) has been discovered in various DNS resolving software. The NRDelegation Attack works by having a malicious delegation with a considerable number of non responsive nameservers. The attack starts by querying a resolver for a record that relies on those unresponsive nameservers. The attack can cause a resolver to spend a lot of time/resources resolving records under a malicious delegation point where a considerable number of unresponsive NS records reside. It can trigger high CPU usage in some resolver implementations that continually look in the cache for resolved NS records in that delegation. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in orchestrated attacks. Unbound does not suffer from high CPU usage, but resources are still needed for resolving the malicious delegation. Unbound will keep trying to resolve the record until hard limits are reached. Based on the nature of the attack and the replies, different limits could be reached. From version 1.16.3 on, Unbound introduces fixes for better performance when under load, by cutting opportunistic queries for nameserver discovery and DNSKEY prefetching and limiting the number of times a delegation point can issue a cache lookup for missing records.
Aliases
Aliases



{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2022-3204",
    "id": "GSD-2022-3204",
    "references": [
      "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2022-3204.html",
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3204.html",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-3204"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2022-3204"
      ],
      "details": "A vulnerability named \u0027Non-Responsive Delegation Attack\u0027 (NRDelegation Attack) has been discovered in various DNS resolving software. The NRDelegation Attack works by having a malicious delegation with a considerable number of non responsive nameservers. The attack starts by querying a resolver for a record that relies on those unresponsive nameservers. The attack can cause a resolver to spend a lot of time/resources resolving records under a malicious delegation point where a considerable number of unresponsive NS records reside. It can trigger high CPU usage in some resolver implementations that continually look in the cache for resolved NS records in that delegation. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in orchestrated attacks. Unbound does not suffer from high CPU usage, but resources are still needed for resolving the malicious delegation. Unbound will keep trying to resolve the record until hard limits are reached. Based on the nature of the attack and the replies, different limits could be reached. From version 1.16.3 on, Unbound introduces fixes for better performance when under load, by cutting opportunistic queries for nameserver discovery and DNSKEY prefetching and limiting the number of times a delegation point can issue a cache lookup for missing records.",
      "id": "GSD-2022-3204",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:40.443263Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
        "DATE_PUBLIC": "2022-09-21T00:00:00.000Z",
        "ID": "CVE-2022-3204",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "NRDelegation Attack"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Unbound",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                          "version_value": "1.16.2"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "NLnet Labs"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "credit": [
        {
          "lang": "eng",
          "value": "We would like to thank Yehuda Afek from Tel-Aviv University, Anat Bremler-Barr and Shani Stajnrod from Reichman University for discovering and disclosing the vulnerability."
        }
      ],
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "A vulnerability named \u0027Non-Responsive Delegation Attack\u0027 (NRDelegation Attack) has been discovered in various DNS resolving software. The NRDelegation Attack works by having a malicious delegation with a considerable number of non responsive nameservers. The attack starts by querying a resolver for a record that relies on those unresponsive nameservers. The attack can cause a resolver to spend a lot of time/resources resolving records under a malicious delegation point where a considerable number of unresponsive NS records reside. It can trigger high CPU usage in some resolver implementations that continually look in the cache for resolved NS records in that delegation. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in orchestrated attacks. Unbound does not suffer from high CPU usage, but resources are still needed for resolving the malicious delegation. Unbound will keep trying to resolve the record until hard limits are reached. Based on the nature of the attack and the replies, different limits could be reached. From version 1.16.3 on, Unbound introduces fixes for better performance when under load, by cutting opportunistic queries for nameserver discovery and DNSKEY prefetching and limiting the number of times a delegation point can issue a cache lookup for missing records."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2022-3204.txt",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2022-3204.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2022-1326d2815c",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3G2HS6CYPSIGAKO6QLEZPG3RD6AMPB7B/"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2022-164cf7837e",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/35QGS5FBQTG3DBSK7QV67PA64P24ABHY/"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2022-204ee3da84",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4S4EU6DMJXQFMAIE6SLAH4H5RNRU6VQL/"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-202212-02",
            "refsource": "GENTOO",
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-02"
          },
          {
            "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20230329 [SECURITY] [DLA 3371-1] unbound security update",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/03/msg00024.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "1.16.2",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:37:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-3204"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "A vulnerability named \u0027Non-Responsive Delegation Attack\u0027 (NRDelegation Attack) has been discovered in various DNS resolving software. The NRDelegation Attack works by having a malicious delegation with a considerable number of non responsive nameservers. The attack starts by querying a resolver for a record that relies on those unresponsive nameservers. The attack can cause a resolver to spend a lot of time/resources resolving records under a malicious delegation point where a considerable number of unresponsive NS records reside. It can trigger high CPU usage in some resolver implementations that continually look in the cache for resolved NS records in that delegation. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in orchestrated attacks. Unbound does not suffer from high CPU usage, but resources are still needed for resolving the malicious delegation. Unbound will keep trying to resolve the record until hard limits are reached. Based on the nature of the attack and the replies, different limits could be reached. From version 1.16.3 on, Unbound introduces fixes for better performance when under load, by cutting opportunistic queries for nameserver discovery and DNSKEY prefetching and limiting the number of times a delegation point can issue a cache lookup for missing records."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-400"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2022-3204.txt",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2022-3204.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2022-1326d2815c",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3G2HS6CYPSIGAKO6QLEZPG3RD6AMPB7B/"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2022-164cf7837e",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/35QGS5FBQTG3DBSK7QV67PA64P24ABHY/"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2022-204ee3da84",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4S4EU6DMJXQFMAIE6SLAH4H5RNRU6VQL/"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-202212-02",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-02"
            },
            {
              "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20230329 [SECURITY] [DLA 3371-1] unbound security update",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/03/msg00024.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2023-03-29T15:15Z",
      "publishedDate": "2022-09-26T14:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.