gsd-2019-12586
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 processes EAP Success messages before any EAP method completion or failure, which allows attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted message.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2019-12586", "description": "The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 processes EAP Success messages before any EAP method completion or failure, which allows attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted message.", "id": "GSD-2019-12586" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-12586" ], "details": "The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 processes EAP Success messages before any EAP method completion or failure, which allows attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted message.", "id": "GSD-2019-12586", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:44.040319Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2019-12586", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 processes EAP Success messages before any EAP method completion or failure, which allows attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted message." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/espressif", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/espressif" }, { "name": "https://github.com/Matheus-Garbelini/esp32_esp8266_attacks", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/Matheus-Garbelini/esp32_esp8266_attacks" }, { "name": "https://matheus-garbelini.github.io/home/post/esp32-esp8266-eap-crash/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://matheus-garbelini.github.io/home/post/esp32-esp8266-eap-crash/" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:arduino-esp32:1.0.3:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:arduino-esp32:1.0.3:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:arduino-esp32:1.0.3:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp-idf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "4.0.0", "versionStartIncluding": "2.0.0", "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:arduino-esp32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "1.0.2", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp8266_nonos_sdk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "3.0.0", "versionStartIncluding": "2.2.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2019-12586" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 processes EAP Success messages before any EAP method completion or failure, which allows attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted message." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/espressif", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/espressif" }, { "name": "https://matheus-garbelini.github.io/home/post/esp32-esp8266-eap-crash/", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://matheus-garbelini.github.io/home/post/esp32-esp8266-eap-crash/" }, { "name": "https://github.com/Matheus-Garbelini/esp32_esp8266_attacks", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/Matheus-Garbelini/esp32_esp8266_attacks" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 3.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 6.5, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "LOW", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2020-08-24T17:37Z", "publishedDate": "2019-09-04T20:15Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.