gsd-2018-12549
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2018-12549", description: "In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it.", id: "GSD-2018-12549", references: [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12549.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2018-12549", ], details: "In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it.", id: "GSD-2018-12549", modified: "2023-12-13T01:22:30.154491Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security@eclipse.org", ID: "CVE-2018-12549", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "Eclipse OpenJ9", version: { version_data: [ { version_affected: "=", version_value: "0.11.0", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "The Eclipse Foundation", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "CWE-111: Direct Use of Unsafe JNI", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "RHSA-2019:0469", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:0472", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472", }, { name: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=544019", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=544019", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:0640", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:1238", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:openj9:0.11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:5.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security@eclipse.org", ID: "CVE-2018-12549", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-20", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=544019", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [ "Mitigation", "Issue Tracking", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=544019", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:0469", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:0472", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:0640", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640", }, { name: "RHSA-2019:1238", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { acInsufInfo: false, cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 7.5, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 6.4, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "HIGH", userInteractionRequired: false, }, baseMetricV3: { cvssV3: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 5.9, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2019-05-16T16:29Z", publishedDate: "2019-02-11T15:29Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.