gsd-2018-10299
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the "batchOverflow" issue.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2018-10299


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2018-10299",
    "description": "An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the \"batchOverflow\" issue.",
    "id": "GSD-2018-10299"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2018-10299"
      ],
      "details": "An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the \"batchOverflow\" issue.",
      "id": "GSD-2018-10299",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:41.711653Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2018-10299",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the \"batchOverflow\" issue."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://medium.com/secbit-media/a-disastrous-vulnerability-found-in-smart-contracts-of-beautychain-bec-dbf24ddbc30e",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://medium.com/secbit-media/a-disastrous-vulnerability-found-in-smart-contracts-of-beautychain-bec-dbf24ddbc30e"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://twitter.com/OKEx_/status/987967343983714304",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://twitter.com/OKEx_/status/987967343983714304"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8esyg9/okex_erc20_bug/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8esyg9/okex_erc20_bug/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://dasp.co/#item-3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://dasp.co/#item-3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://peckshield.com/2018/04/22/batchOverflow/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://peckshield.com/2018/04/22/batchOverflow/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://support.okex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002944212-BeautyChain-BEC-Withdrawal-and-Trading-Suspended",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://support.okex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002944212-BeautyChain-BEC-Withdrawal-and-Trading-Suspended"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:beauty:beauty_ecosystem_coin:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2018-10299"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the \"batchOverflow\" issue."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-190"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://twitter.com/OKEx_/status/987967343983714304",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://twitter.com/OKEx_/status/987967343983714304"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://support.okex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002944212-BeautyChain-BEC-Withdrawal-and-Trading-Suspended",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://support.okex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002944212-BeautyChain-BEC-Withdrawal-and-Trading-Suspended"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://peckshield.com/2018/04/22/batchOverflow/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://peckshield.com/2018/04/22/batchOverflow/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://dasp.co/#item-3",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://dasp.co/#item-3"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8esyg9/okex_erc20_bug/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Issue Tracking",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8esyg9/okex_erc20_bug/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://medium.com/secbit-media/a-disastrous-vulnerability-found-in-smart-contracts-of-beautychain-bec-dbf24ddbc30e",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://medium.com/secbit-media/a-disastrous-vulnerability-found-in-smart-contracts-of-beautychain-bec-dbf24ddbc30e"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-08-29T15:40Z",
      "publishedDate": "2018-04-23T04:29Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.