gsd-2017-16844
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2017-16844",
"description": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.",
"id": "GSD-2017-16844",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16844.html",
"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269",
"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-16844",
"https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2017-16844",
"https://alas.aws.amazon.com/cve/html/CVE-2017-16844.html",
"https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2017-16844.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-16844"
],
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.",
"id": "GSD-2017-16844",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:01.126151Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-16844",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171118 [SECURITY] [DLA 1173-1] procmail security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00019.html"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:3269",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269"
},
{
"name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4041",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041"
},
{
"name": "1039844",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039844"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:procmail:procmail:3.22:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-16844"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4041",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041"
},
{
"name": "1039844",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039844"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:3269",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171118 [SECURITY] [DLA 1173-1] procmail security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00019.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 10.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2018-02-04T02:29Z",
"publishedDate": "2017-11-16T15:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…