gsd-2017-16844
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2017-16844", "description": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.", "id": "GSD-2017-16844", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16844.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-16844", "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2017-16844", "https://alas.aws.amazon.com/cve/html/CVE-2017-16844.html", "https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2017-16844.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-16844" ], "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.", "id": "GSD-2017-16844", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:01.126151Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2017-16844", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171118 [SECURITY] [DLA 1173-1] procmail security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00019.html" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:3269", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269" }, { "name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511" }, { "name": "DSA-4041", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041" }, { "name": "1039844", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039844" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:procmail:procmail:3.22:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2017-16844" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-119" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511" }, { "name": "DSA-4041", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041" }, { "name": "1039844", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039844" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:3269", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171118 [SECURITY] [DLA 1173-1] procmail security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00019.html" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "HIGH", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2018-02-04T02:29Z", "publishedDate": "2017-11-16T15:29Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.