gsd-2016-5394
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2016-5394", "description": "In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities.", "id": "GSD-2016-5394" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-5394" ], "details": "In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities.", "id": "GSD-2016-5394", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:25.810076Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-07-18T00:00:00", "ID": "CVE-2016-5394", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Apache Sling", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "prior to 1.0.12" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/332166037a54b97cf41e2b616aaed38439de94b19b204841478e4525@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/332166037a54b97cf41e2b616aaed38439de94b19b204841478e4525@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E" }, { "name": "99870", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99870" } ] } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "(,1.0.11]", "affected_versions": "All versions up to 1.0.11", "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-79", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2017-07-21", "description": "In the XSS Protection API module in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the `XSSAPI.encodeForJSString()` method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities.", "fixed_versions": [ "2.0" ], "identifier": "CVE-2016-5394", "identifiers": [ "CVE-2016-5394" ], "not_impacted": "All versions after 1.0.11", "package_slug": "maven/org.apache.sling/org.apache.sling.xss", "pubdate": "2017-07-19", "solution": "Upgrade to version 2.0 or above.", "title": "Cross-site Scripting", "urls": [ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5394", "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99870" ], "uuid": "0d258d7b-117e-46a0-bb2c-89e574897eac" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:sling:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "1.0.12", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2016-5394" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the encoding done by the XSSAPI.encodeForJSString() method is not restrictive enough and for some input patterns allows script tags to pass through unencoded, leading to potential XSS vulnerabilities." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-79" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/332166037a54b97cf41e2b616aaed38439de94b19b204841478e4525@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/332166037a54b97cf41e2b616aaed38439de94b19b204841478e4525@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E" }, { "name": "99870", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99870" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": true }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 6.1, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "CHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 2.7 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2020-07-01T13:41Z", "publishedDate": "2017-07-19T15:29Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…