gsd-2006-2369
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as "Type 1 - None", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2006-2369", "description": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.", "id": "GSD-2006-2369", "references": [ "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2006-2369" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-2369" ], "details": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.", "id": "GSD-2006-2369", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:52.840819Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2006-2369", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "=", "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29" }, { "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107" }, { "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109" }, { "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789" }, { "name": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355" }, { "name": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083" }, { "name": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml" }, { "name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html" }, { "name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html" }, { "name": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929" }, { "name": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479" }, { "name": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978" }, { "name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790" }, { "name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821" }, { "name": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492" }, { "name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:vnc:realvnc:4.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2006-2369" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-287" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html" }, { "name": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html" }, { "name": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html" }, { "name": "VU#117929", "refsource": "CERT-VN", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", "US Government Resource" ], "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929" }, { "name": "17978", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978" }, { "name": "1016083", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch" ], "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083" }, { "name": "20107", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107" }, { "name": "20109", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109" }, { "name": "25479", "refsource": "OSVDB", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479" }, { "name": "20060622 RealVNC Remote Authentication Bypass Vulnerability", "refsource": "CISCO", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml" }, { "name": "20789", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789" }, { "name": "ADV-2006-1790", "refsource": "VUPEN", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790" }, { "name": "ADV-2006-2492", "refsource": "VUPEN", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492" }, { "name": "ADV-2006-1821", "refsource": "VUPEN", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821" }, { "name": "8355", "refsource": "SREASON", "tags": [], "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355" }, { "name": "[vnc-list] 20060513 Version 4.1.2", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "20060515 RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "FULLDISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "realvnc-auth-bypass(26445)", "refsource": "XF", "tags": [], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445" }, { "name": "20060624 Re: Linux VNC evil client patch - BID 17978", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060623 Linux VNC evil client patch - BID 17978", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060520 Re: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060518 RE: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060516 re: RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060515 Re: [Full-disclosure] RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20060515 RealVNC 4.1.1 Remote Compromise", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded" }, { "name": "20220513 some details regarding CVE-2022-24422 / iDRAC VNC authentication", "refsource": "FULLDISC", "tags": [], "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": true, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "HIGH", "userInteractionRequired": false } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2022-05-13T18:15Z", "publishedDate": "2006-05-15T16:06Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…