gsd-2006-1079
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2006-1079",
"description": "htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.",
"id": "GSD-2006-1079"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1079"
],
"details": "htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.",
"id": "GSD-2006-1079",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:55.641469Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-1079",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20060305 htpasswd bufferoverflow and command execution in thttpd-2.25b.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426823/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "[thttpd] 20060305 Re: htpasswd.c security issues",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114154083000296\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "thttpd-command-line-bo(25217)",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25217"
},
{
"name": "16972",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16972"
},
{
"name": "23828",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23828"
},
{
"name": "[thttpd] 20060305 htpasswd.c security issues",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114153031201867\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "20231127 SEC Consult SA-20231122 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in m-privacy TightGate-Pro",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/13"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.html"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:acme_labs:thttpd:2.25b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-1079"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via shell metacharacters in a command line argument, which is used in a call to the system function. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-264"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "23828",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23828"
},
{
"name": "16972",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16972"
},
{
"name": "[thttpd] 20060305 htpasswd.c security issues",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114153031201867\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "[thttpd] 20060305 Re: htpasswd.c security issues",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=thttpd\u0026m=114154083000296\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "thttpd-command-line-bo(25217)",
"refsource": "XF",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25217"
},
{
"name": "20060305 htpasswd bufferoverflow and command execution in thttpd-2.25b.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426823/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20231127 SEC Consult SA-20231122 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in m-privacy TightGate-Pro",
"refsource": "",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/13"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.html",
"refsource": "",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": true,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-11-28T17:15Z",
"publishedDate": "2006-03-09T00:02Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…