gsd-2004-2761
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2004-2761", description: "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.", id: "GSD-2004-2761", references: [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2004-2761.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010:0838", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010:0837", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2004-2761", ], details: "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.", id: "GSD-2004-2761", modified: "2023-12-13T01:22:55.034845Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2004-2761", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "33065", refsource: "BID", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33065", }, { name: "RHSA-2010:0837", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0837.html", }, { name: "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/", }, { name: "VU#836068", refsource: "CERT-VN", url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068", }, { name: "4866", refsource: "SREASON", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4866", }, { name: "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/", }, { name: "20090115 MD5 Hashes May Allow for Certificate Spoofing", refsource: "CISCO", url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a5d24a.html", }, { name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/", }, { name: "33826", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/33826", }, { name: "34281", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/34281", }, { name: "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx", }, { name: "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us", }, { name: "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx", }, { name: "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf", }, { name: "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02", }, { name: "RHSA-2010:0838", refsource: "REDHAT", url: "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0838.html", }, { name: "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php", }, { name: "USN-740-1", refsource: "UBUNTU", url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-740-1", }, { name: "1024697", refsource: "SECTRACK", url: "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024697", }, { name: "FEDORA-2009-1276", refsource: "FEDORA", url: "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-February/msg00096.html", }, { name: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888", }, { name: "20081230 MD5 Considered Harmful Today: Creating a rogue CA certificate", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499685/100/0/threaded", }, { name: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935", }, { name: "42181", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/42181", }, { name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/", }, { name: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:md5:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:x.509_certificate:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: false, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], cpe_match: [], operator: "AND", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2004-2761", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-310", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php", }, { name: "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/", }, { name: "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Mitigation", "Patch", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx", }, { name: "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/", }, { name: "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf", }, { name: "33065", refsource: "BID", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33065", }, { name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/", }, { name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/", }, { name: "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx", }, { name: "VU#836068", refsource: "CERT-VN", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "US Government Resource", ], url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068", }, { name: "4866", refsource: "SREASON", tags: [], url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4866", }, { name: "20090115 MD5 Hashes May Allow for Certificate Spoofing", refsource: "CISCO", tags: [], url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a5d24a.html", }, { name: "33826", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/33826", }, { name: "FEDORA-2009-1276", refsource: "FEDORA", tags: [], url: "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-February/msg00096.html", }, { name: "USN-740-1", refsource: "UBUNTU", tags: [], url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-740-1", }, { name: "34281", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/34281", }, { name: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886", }, { name: "1024697", refsource: "SECTRACK", tags: [], url: "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024697", }, { name: "RHSA-2010:0838", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [], url: "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0838.html", }, { name: "RHSA-2010:0837", refsource: "REDHAT", tags: [], url: "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0837.html", }, { name: "42181", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/42181", }, { name: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935", }, { name: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888", }, { name: "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02", refsource: "MISC", tags: [], url: "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02", }, { name: "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us", refsource: "CONFIRM", tags: [], url: "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us", }, { name: "20081230 MD5 Considered Harmful Today: Creating a rogue CA certificate", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499685/100/0/threaded", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { acInsufInfo: true, cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 5, confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "MEDIUM", userInteractionRequired: false, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2018-10-19T15:30Z", publishedDate: "2009-01-05T20:30Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.