gsd-2004-2761
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2004-2761",
"description": "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.",
"id": "GSD-2004-2761",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2004-2761.html",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010:0838",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010:0837"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-2761"
],
"details": "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.",
"id": "GSD-2004-2761",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:55.034845Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2004-2761",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "33065",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33065"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2010:0837",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0837.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/"
},
{
"name": "VU#836068",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068"
},
{
"name": "4866",
"refsource": "SREASON",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4866"
},
{
"name": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/"
},
{
"name": "20090115 MD5 Hashes May Allow for Certificate Spoofing",
"refsource": "CISCO",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a5d24a.html"
},
{
"name": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/"
},
{
"name": "33826",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33826"
},
{
"name": "34281",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34281"
},
{
"name": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx"
},
{
"name": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us"
},
{
"name": "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx"
},
{
"name": "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf"
},
{
"name": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2010:0838",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0838.html"
},
{
"name": "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php"
},
{
"name": "USN-740-1",
"refsource": "UBUNTU",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-740-1"
},
{
"name": "1024697",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024697"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2009-1276",
"refsource": "FEDORA",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-February/msg00096.html"
},
{
"name": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888"
},
{
"name": "20081230 MD5 Considered Harmful Today: Creating a rogue CA certificate",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499685/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935"
},
{
"name": "42181",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42181"
},
{
"name": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:md5:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:x.509_certificate:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2004-2761"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php"
},
{
"name": "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/"
},
{
"name": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Mitigation",
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961509.mspx"
},
{
"name": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/30/md5-weaknesses-could-lead-to-certificate-forgery/"
},
{
"name": "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.doxpara.com/research/md5/md5_someday.pdf"
},
{
"name": "33065",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33065"
},
{
"name": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/"
},
{
"name": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/"
},
{
"name": "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/12/30/information-regarding-md5-collisions-problem.aspx"
},
{
"name": "VU#836068",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068"
},
{
"name": "4866",
"refsource": "SREASON",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4866"
},
{
"name": "20090115 MD5 Hashes May Allow for Certificate Spoofing",
"refsource": "CISCO",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a5d24a.html"
},
{
"name": "33826",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33826"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2009-1276",
"refsource": "FEDORA",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-February/msg00096.html"
},
{
"name": "USN-740-1",
"refsource": "UBUNTU",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-740-1"
},
{
"name": "34281",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34281"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648886"
},
{
"name": "1024697",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024697"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2010:0838",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0838.html"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2010:0837",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0837.html"
},
{
"name": "42181",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42181"
},
{
"name": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05289935"
},
{
"name": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05336888"
},
{
"name": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02"
},
{
"name": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03814en_us"
},
{
"name": "20081230 MD5 Considered Harmful Today: Creating a rogue CA certificate",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499685/100/0/threaded"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": true,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-19T15:30Z",
"publishedDate": "2009-01-05T20:30Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.