ghsa-xwjw-7gc4-5h47
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:08
Modified
2022-05-02 00:08
VLAI Severity ?
Details
tog-pegasus in OpenGroup Pegasus 2.7.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, Fedora 9, and Fedora 10 does not log failed authentication attempts to the OpenPegasus CIM server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to avoid detection of password guessing attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-4315"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-11-27T00:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "tog-pegasus in OpenGroup Pegasus 2.7.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, Fedora 9, and Fedora 10 does not log failed authentication attempts to the OpenPegasus CIM server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to avoid detection of password guessing attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-xwjw-7gc4-5h47",
"modified": "2022-05-02T00:08:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:08:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4315"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tog-pegasus-2.7.0-7.fc9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tog-pegasus-2.7.1-3.fc10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46830"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/50278"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32862"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-1001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021281"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…