ghsa-xwjm-m85h-4ff8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
Details
Multiple integer overflows in xpdf 3.0, and other packages that use xpdf code such as CUPS, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, a different set of vulnerabilities than those identified by CVE-2004-0888.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-0889" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-27T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple integer overflows in xpdf 3.0, and other packages that use xpdf code such as CUPS, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, a different set of vulnerabilities than those identified by CVE-2004-0888.", "id": "GHSA-xwjm-m85h-4ff8", "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:32Z", "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0889" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17819" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=109880927526773\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200410-20.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200410-30.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:113" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11501" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.