ghsa-xrx4-hghv-p3q8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 03:01
Modified
2022-04-29 03:01
Details

Integer overflow in Trillian 0.74 and earlier, and Trillian Pro 2.01 and earlier, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a directIM packet that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-2304"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in Trillian 0.74 and earlier, and Trillian Pro 2.01 and earlier, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a directIM packet that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-xrx4-hghv-p3q8",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T03:01:10Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T03:01:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2304"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15303"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.seifried.org/pipermail/security/2004-February/001869.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/10973"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/022004.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1009220"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/4056"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9489"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.