ghsa-xqj7-j8j5-f2xr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-10-16 17:44
Modified
2022-04-26 18:56
Severity ?
Summary
Bouncy Castle has a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator
Details
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk14" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.60" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.60" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-1000180" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-327" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T22:04:14Z", "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-05T13:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.", "id": "GHSA-xqj7-j8j5-f2xr", "modified": "2022-04-26T18:56:38Z", "published": "2018-10-16T17:44:39Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000180" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/22467b6e8fe19717ecdf201c0cf91bacf04a55ad" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/73780ac522b7795fc165630aba8d5f5729acc839" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4233" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.bountysource.com/issues/58293083-rsa-key-generation-computation-of-iterations-for-mr-primality-test" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190204-0003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451@%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE-2018-1000180" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xqj7-j8j5-f2xr" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2428" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2425" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2424" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2423" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106567" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Bouncy Castle has a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.