ghsa-xcpq-cc29-8fch
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:18
Modified
2022-05-01 18:18
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Outlook Express 6 and earlier, and Windows Mail for Vista, allows remote Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) servers to execute arbitrary code via long NNTP responses that trigger memory corruption.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-3897" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-10-09T22:17:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Outlook Express 6 and earlier, and Windows Mail for Vista, allows remote Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) servers to execute arbitrary code via long NNTP responses that trigger memory corruption.", "id": "GHSA-xcpq-cc29-8fch", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:18:29Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:18:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3897" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-056" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1706" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=607" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27112" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1018785" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1018786" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/481983/100/100/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482366/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25908" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-282A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3436" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.