ghsa-x8qh-8j65-v4j9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-14 15:32
Modified
2025-02-28 15:30
Severity ?
Details
iPerf3 before 3.17, when used with OpenSSL before 3.2.0 as a server with RSA authentication, allows a timing side channel in RSA decryption operations. This side channel could be sufficient for an attacker to recover credential plaintext. It requires the attacker to send a large number of messages for decryption, as described in "Everlasting ROBOT: the Marvin Attack" by Hubert Kario.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-26306", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-385", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-05-14T15:08:51Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "iPerf3 before 3.17, when used with OpenSSL before 3.2.0 as a server with RSA authentication, allows a timing side channel in RSA decryption operations. This side channel could be sufficient for an attacker to recover credential plaintext. It requires the attacker to send a large number of messages for decryption, as described in \"Everlasting ROBOT: the Marvin Attack\" by Hubert Kario.", id: "GHSA-x8qh-8j65-v4j9", modified: "2025-02-28T15:30:59Z", published: "2024-05-14T15:32:52Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26306", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://downloads.es.net/pub/iperf/esnet-secadv-2024-0001.txt.asc", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/esnet/iperf/releases/tag/3.17", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250228-0007", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2024005", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.