ghsa-x569-chqv-xjj7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:19
Modified
2022-05-14 02:19
Severity ?
Details
mspack/lzxd.c in libmspack 0.5alpha, as used in ClamAV 0.99.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted CHM file.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-6419", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-08-07T03:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "mspack/lzxd.c in libmspack 0.5alpha, as used in ClamAV 0.99.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted CHM file.", id: "GHSA-x569-chqv-xjj7", modified: "2022-05-14T02:19:44Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:19:44Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6419", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel/commit/a83773682e856ad6529ba6db8d1792e6d515d7f1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11701", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/varsleak/varsleak-vul/blob/master/clamav-vul/heap-overflow/clamav_chm_crash.md", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00014.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201804-16", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3946", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.