ghsa-x4w4-294m-j35h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-03 09:30
Modified
2025-11-21 00:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: MGMT: reject malformed HCI_CMD_SYNC commands
In 'mgmt_hci_cmd_sync()', check whether the size of parameters passed in 'struct mgmt_cp_hci_cmd_sync' matches the total size of the data (i.e. 'sizeof(struct mgmt_cp_hci_cmd_sync)' plus trailing bytes). Otherwise, large invalid 'params_len' will cause 'hci_cmd_sync_alloc()' to do 'skb_put_data()' from an area beyond the one actually passed to 'mgmt_hci_cmd_sync()'.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-38128"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-03T09:15:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: MGMT: reject malformed HCI_CMD_SYNC commands\n\nIn \u0027mgmt_hci_cmd_sync()\u0027, check whether the size of parameters passed\nin \u0027struct mgmt_cp_hci_cmd_sync\u0027 matches the total size of the data\n(i.e. \u0027sizeof(struct mgmt_cp_hci_cmd_sync)\u0027 plus trailing bytes).\nOtherwise, large invalid \u0027params_len\u0027 will cause \u0027hci_cmd_sync_alloc()\u0027\nto do \u0027skb_put_data()\u0027 from an area beyond the one actually passed to\n\u0027mgmt_hci_cmd_sync()\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-x4w4-294m-j35h",
"modified": "2025-11-21T00:30:20Z",
"published": "2025-07-03T09:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03f1700b9b4d4f2fed3165370f3c23db76553178"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9eeafd16d76a7642d12b3442a26c15cd345e12f7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…