ghsa-x489-jjwm-52g7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-08-28 22:34
Modified
2023-07-05 20:45
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
Tinfoil Devise-two-factor does not "burn" a successfully validated one-time password (OTP)
Details

Tinfoil Devise-two-factor before 2.0.0 does not strictly follow RFC 6238 § 5.2 and does not "burn" a successfully validated one-time password (aka OTP), which allows physically proximate attackers with a target user's login credentials to log in as said user by obtaining the OTP through performing a man-in-the-middle attack between the provider and verifier, or "shoulder surfing", and replaying the OTP in the current time-step.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "devise-two-factor"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-7225"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T22:02:02Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Tinfoil Devise-two-factor before 2.0.0 does not strictly follow [RFC 6238 \u00a7 5.2 ](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6238#section-5.2) and does not \"burn\" a successfully validated one-time password (aka OTP), which allows physically proximate attackers with a target user\u0027s login credentials to log in as said user by obtaining the OTP through performing a man-in-the-middle attack between the provider and verifier, or \"shoulder surfing\", and replaying the OTP in the current time-step.",
  "id": "GHSA-x489-jjwm-52g7",
  "modified": "2023-07-05T20:45:12Z",
  "published": "2018-08-28T22:34:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7225"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tinfoil/devise-two-factor/issues/45#issuecomment-139335608"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798466"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x489-jjwm-52g7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/devise-two-factor/CVE-2015-7225.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/tinfoil/devise-two-factor"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tinfoil/devise-two-factor/blob/master/UPGRADING.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210122192452/https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76789"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/20/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/09/06/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/09/17/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Tinfoil Devise-two-factor does not \"burn\" a successfully validated one-time password (OTP)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.