GHSA-X3C7-22C8-PRG7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-13 21:09 – Updated: 2025-06-14 00:23
VLAI?
Summary
handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv has Potential Gadget Chain allowing Remote Code Execution
Details

Impact

goodby-csv could be used as part of a chain of methods that is exploitable when an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in an application. This so-called "gadget chain" presents no direct threat but is a vector that can be used to achieve remote code execution if the application deserializes untrusted data due to another vulnerability.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

The problem is patched with Version 1.4.3

Workarounds

Patch src/Goodby/CSV/Export/Standard/Collection /CallbackCollection.php:

+    public function __wakeup() {
+       throw new \BadMethodCallException('Cannot unserialize ' . __CLASS__);
+    }

However, this is not directly exploitable; a separate vulnerability must be present to allow an attacker to pass unsafe input to unserialize(). There are no such known exploits in goodby-csv.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Severity ?
3.9 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-49597"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-915"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-06-13T21:09:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-13T20:15:23Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\ngoodby-csv could be used as part of a chain of methods that is exploitable when an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in an application. This so-called \"gadget chain\" presents no direct threat but is a vector that can be used to achieve remote code execution if the application deserializes untrusted data due to another vulnerability.\n\n### Patches\n\nHas the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?\n\nThe problem is patched with Version 1.4.3\n\n### Workarounds\n\nPatch `src/Goodby/CSV/Export/Standard/Collection /CallbackCollection.php`:\n\n```diff\n+    public function __wakeup() {\n+       throw new \\BadMethodCallException(\u0027Cannot unserialize \u0027 . __CLASS__);\n+    }\n```\n\nHowever, this is not directly exploitable; a separate vulnerability must be present to allow an attacker to pass unsafe input to unserialize(). There are no such known exploits in goodby-csv.\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_",
  "id": "GHSA-x3c7-22c8-prg7",
  "modified": "2025-06-14T00:23:21Z",
  "published": "2025-06-13T21:09:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv/security/advisories/GHSA-x3c7-22c8-prg7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49597"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv/commit/acd14c6ed85116bb2cb4da35ab62821e5cf54519"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "handcraftedinthealps/goodby-csv has Potential Gadget Chain allowing Remote Code Execution"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.