ghsa-ww8h-qfvw-pj5m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-12-24 15:30
Modified
2025-12-24 15:30
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64/pageattr: Propagate return value from __change_memory_common
The rodata=on security measure requires that any code path which does vmalloc -> set_memory_ro/set_memory_rox must protect the linear map alias too. Therefore, if such a call fails, we must abort set_memory_* and caller must take appropriate action; currently we are suppressing the error, and there is a real chance of such an error arising post commit a166563e7ec3 ("arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full"). Therefore, propagate any error to the caller.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68737"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T13:16:28Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64/pageattr: Propagate return value from __change_memory_common\n\nThe rodata=on security measure requires that any code path which does\nvmalloc -\u003e set_memory_ro/set_memory_rox must protect the linear map alias\ntoo. Therefore, if such a call fails, we must abort set_memory_* and caller\nmust take appropriate action; currently we are suppressing the error, and\nthere is a real chance of such an error arising post commit a166563e7ec3\n(\"arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full\"). Therefore,\npropagate any error to the caller.",
"id": "GHSA-ww8h-qfvw-pj5m",
"modified": "2025-12-24T15:30:43Z",
"published": "2025-12-24T15:30:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68737"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e2fc1e57a5361633a4bf4222640c6bfe41ff8ea"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5efd56fa157d2e7d789949d1d64eccbac18a897"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…