ghsa-ww4p-6452-jmh8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:40
Modified
2022-05-02 03:40
Details
Buffer overflow in the FTP Service in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 5.0 through 6.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted NLST (NAME LIST) command that uses wildcards, leading to memory corruption, aka "IIS FTP Service RCE and DoS Vulnerability."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-3023" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-08-31T20:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the FTP Service in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 5.0 through 6.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted NLST (NAME LIST) command that uses wildcards, leading to memory corruption, aka \"IIS FTP Service RCE and DoS Vulnerability.\"", "id": "GHSA-ww4p-6452-jmh8", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:40:54Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:40:54Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3023" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-053" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6080" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q975191" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/9541" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/9559" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/276653" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36189" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2481" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.