ghsa-wqw7-xgf9-5p2q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-17 18:31
Modified
2025-03-17 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

regulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe

of_find_node_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when done. Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49466"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:22Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nregulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe\n\nof_find_node_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount\nincremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when done.\nAdd missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqw7-xgf9-5p2q",
  "modified": "2025-03-17T18:31:50Z",
  "published": "2025-03-17T18:31:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49466"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/299a002161c7bfb72e99ba45e5b660aecc344ea0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a59c763ef9b68c711dc2fd2ef4a6648da5480ee"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/68d6c8476fd4f448e70e0ab31ff972838ac41dae"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ebbfa73d69909b7c737f599fd4ebd42318fc881"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…