ghsa-wm5j-7vrw-x2hq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:54
Modified
2022-05-14 03:54
Severity ?
Details
FFmpeg in Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Linux, Windows and Mac, failed to perform proper bounds checking, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted video file.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-5025", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-02-17T07:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "FFmpeg in Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Linux, Windows and Mac, failed to perform proper bounds checking, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted video file.", id: "GHSA-wm5j-7vrw-x2hq", modified: "2022-05-14T03:54:09Z", published: "2022-05-14T03:54:09Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5025", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://crbug.com/643950", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-66", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201705-05", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0206.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3776", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95792", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037718", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.