ghsa-wgvf-wh5w-rhm5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:39
Modified
2022-05-17 04:39
Details

Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Email::Address::List before 0.02, as used in RT 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a string without an address.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-1474"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-07-15T14:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Email::Address::List before 0.02, as used in RT 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a string without an address.",
  "id": "GHSA-wgvf-wh5w-rhm5",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:39:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:39:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://metacpan.org/changes/release/ALEXMV/Email-Address-List-0.02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://blog.bestpractical.com/2014/01/security-vulnerability-in-rt-42.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2014-June/000257.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…