ghsa-w8v7-prhw-xjpw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:02
Modified
2023-10-06 21:06
Severity ?
Summary
Apache Flex BlazeDS unsafe deserialization
Details
Previous versions of Apache Flex BlazeDS (4.7.2 and earlier) did not restrict which types were allowed for AMF(X) object deserialization by default. During the deserialization process code is executed that for several known types has undesired side-effects. Other, unknown types may also exhibit such behaviors. One vector in the Java standard library exists that allows an attacker to trigger possibly further exploitable Java deserialization of untrusted data. Other known vectors in third party libraries can be used to trigger remote code execution.
{ "affected": [ { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.2" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.flex.blazeds:flex-messaging-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4.7.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.2" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.flex.blazeds:flex-messaging-remoting" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4.7.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-5641" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-502" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-25T21:59:21Z", "nvd_published_at": "2017-12-28T15:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Previous versions of Apache Flex BlazeDS (4.7.2 and earlier) did not restrict which types were allowed for AMF(X) object deserialization by default. During the deserialization process code is executed that for several known types has undesired side-effects. Other, unknown types may also exhibit such behaviors. One vector in the Java standard library exists that allows an attacker to trigger possibly further exploitable Java deserialization of untrusted data. Other known vectors in third party libraries can be used to trigger remote code execution.", "id": "GHSA-w8v7-prhw-xjpw", "modified": "2023-10-06T21:06:16Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:02:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5641" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/apache/flex-blazeds/commit/11b0aa132d9a43bf81fa12654ff227ff247b4627" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/apache/flex-blazeds/commit/f861f0993c35e664906609cad275e45a71e2aaf1" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/apache/flex-blazeds" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35290" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03823en_us" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20170920093830/http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038273" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210124021605/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97383" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/307983" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-22-506" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-22-507" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201703.mbox/%3C6B86C8D0-6E36-48F5-AC81-4AB3978F6746@c-ware.de%3E" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Apache Flex BlazeDS unsafe deserialization" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.