ghsa-w8p6-7232-w86w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:12
Modified
2022-05-02 03:12
Details
Buffer overflow in net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c in the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (sctp) implementation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.28-git8 allows remote attackers to have an unknown impact via an FWD-TSN (aka FORWARD-TSN) chunk with a large stream ID.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-0065" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-01-07T19:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c in the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (sctp) implementation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.28-git8 allows remote attackers to have an unknown impact via an FWD-TSN (aka FORWARD-TSN) chunk with a large stream ID.", "id": "GHSA-w8p6-7232-w86w", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:12:41Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:12:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0065" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478800" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10872" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-January/msg01045.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9fcb95a105758b81ef0131cd18e2db5149f13e95" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01832118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00001.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/15024" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33674" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33854" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33858" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34252" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34394" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34680" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34981" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35011" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35174" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35390" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35394" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36191" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-114.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1749" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1787" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1794" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/05/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0053.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0331.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1055.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33113" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022698" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-751-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0029" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2193" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.