ghsa-w488-94f6-hhmr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:13
Modified
2022-05-24 19:13
Details

The Bluetooth Classic implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.4 and earlier does not properly handle the reception of multiple LMP IO Capability Request packets during the pairing process, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger memory corruption (and consequently a crash) in ESP32 via a replayed (duplicated) LMP packet.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-28136"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-09-07T06:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Bluetooth Classic implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.4 and earlier does not properly handle the reception of multiple LMP IO Capability Request packets during the pairing process, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger memory corruption (and consequently a crash) in ESP32 via a replayed (duplicated) LMP packet.",
  "id": "GHSA-w488-94f6-hhmr",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:13:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:13:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-28136"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/general/braktooth.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp32-bt-lib"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.