ghsa-w2rf-p589-jpp8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:14
Modified
2022-05-17 05:14
Details

Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2011-4318",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2013-03-07T01:55:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.",
   id: "GHSA-w2rf-p589-jpp8",
   modified: "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4318",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390887",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754980",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5e9eaf63a6b1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0520.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46886",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/52311",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2011-November/000200.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/5",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/7",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.