ghsa-w2rf-p589-jpp8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:14
Modified
2022-05-17 05:14
Details
Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4318" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-03-07T01:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.", "id": "GHSA-w2rf-p589-jpp8", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4318" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390887" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754980" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5e9eaf63a6b1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0520.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46886" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/52311" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2011-November/000200.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/7" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.