ghsa-w2rf-p589-jpp8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:14
Modified
2022-05-17 05:14
Details
Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2011-4318", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2013-03-07T01:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.", id: "GHSA-w2rf-p589-jpp8", modified: "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z", published: "2022-05-17T05:14:10Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4318", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390887", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754980", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5e9eaf63a6b1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0520.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46886", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/52311", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2011-November/000200.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/7", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.