ghsa-vw8c-5cg5-c7cj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2022-05-13 01:28
Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the vmnc decoder in the gstreamer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via large width and height values, which triggers a buffer overflow.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-9445", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-190", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-01-23T21:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Integer overflow in the vmnc decoder in the gstreamer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via large width and height values, which triggers a buffer overflow.", id: "GHSA-vw8c-5cg5-c7cj", modified: "2022-05-13T01:28:13Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:28:13Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9445", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774533", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/commit/gst/vmnc/vmncdec.c?id=4cb1bcf1422bbcd79c0f683edb7ee85e3f7a31fe", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.de/2016/11/0day-poc-risky-design-decisions-in.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201705-10", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2974.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0018.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0021.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/18/12", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/18/13", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94421", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.