ghsa-vp3g-8qhm-pw5j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:11
Modified
2022-05-17 03:11
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The pcs daemon (pcsd) in PCS 0.9.137 and earlier does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2015-1848 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-3983"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-05-14T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The pcs daemon (pcsd) in PCS 0.9.137 and earlier does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2015-1848 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.",
"id": "GHSA-vp3g-8qhm-pw5j",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:11:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:11:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3983"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1009855"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/159374.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/159401.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/159412.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0980.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0990.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74682"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…