ghsa-vp2c-23x9-j4wq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2025-04-20 03:48
Severity ?
Details
The receive_xattr function in xattrs.c in rsync 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development does not check for a trailing '\0' character in an xattr name, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by sending crafted data to the daemon.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-16548", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-125", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-11-06T05:29:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "The receive_xattr function in xattrs.c in rsync 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development does not check for a trailing '\\0' character in an xattr name, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by sending crafted data to the daemon.", id: "GHSA-vp2c-23x9-j4wq", modified: "2025-04-20T03:48:04Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:27:06Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16548", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13112", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.samba.org/rsync.git/?p=rsync.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=47a63d90e71d3e19e0e96052bb8c6b9cb140ecc1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.samba.org/rsync.git/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=47a63d90e71d3e19e0e96052bb8c6b9cb140ecc1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3543-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3543-2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4068", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.