ghsa-v6w7-gq3g-fwvm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:43
Modified
2022-06-04 00:00
Severity ?
Details
A stack overflow via an infinite recursion vulnerability was found in the eepro100 i8255x device emulator of QEMU. This issue occurs while processing controller commands due to a DMA reentry issue. This flaw allows a guest user or process to consume CPU cycles or crash the QEMU process on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-20255", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-674", "CWE-835", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-03-09T20:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A stack overflow via an infinite recursion vulnerability was found in the eepro100 i8255x device emulator of QEMU. This issue occurs while processing controller commands due to a DMA reentry issue. This flaw allows a guest user or process to consume CPU cycles or crash the QEMU process on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.", id: "GHSA-v6w7-gq3g-fwvm", modified: "2022-06-04T00:00:55Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:43:53Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20255", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930646", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00009.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://ruhr-uni-bochum.sciebo.de/s/NNWP2GfwzYKeKwE?path=%2Feepro100_stackoverflow1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210507-0003", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/25/1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.