ghsa-v3gm-f9gf-wg97
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
highmem: fix checks in __kmap_local_sched_{in,out}
When CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL is enabled __kmap_local_sched_{in,out} check that even slots in the tsk->kmap_ctrl.pteval are unmapped. The slots are initialized with 0 value, but the check is done with pte_none. 0 pte however does not necessarily mean that pte_none will return true. e.g. on xtensa it returns false, resulting in the following runtime warnings:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101 at mm/highmem.c:627 __kmap_local_sched_out+0x51/0x108 CPU: 0 PID: 101 Comm: touch Not tainted 5.17.0-rc7-00010-gd3a1cdde80d2-dirty #13 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc/0x40 __warn+0x8f/0x174 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0xac __kmap_local_sched_out+0x51/0x108 __schedule+0x71a/0x9c4 preempt_schedule_irq+0xa0/0xe0 common_exception_return+0x5c/0x93 do_wp_page+0x30e/0x330 handle_mm_fault+0xa70/0xc3c do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x3c4 common_exception+0x7f/0x7f
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101 at mm/highmem.c:664 __kmap_local_sched_in+0x50/0xe0 CPU: 0 PID: 101 Comm: touch Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc7-00010-gd3a1cdde80d2-dirty #13 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc/0x40 __warn+0x8f/0x174 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0xac __kmap_local_sched_in+0x50/0xe0 finish_task_switch$isra$0+0x1ce/0x2f8 __schedule+0x86e/0x9c4 preempt_schedule_irq+0xa0/0xe0 common_exception_return+0x5c/0x93 do_wp_page+0x30e/0x330 handle_mm_fault+0xa70/0xc3c do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x3c4 common_exception+0x7f/0x7f
Fix it by replacing !pte_none(pteval) with pte_val(pteval) != 0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-49081"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:00:45Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhighmem: fix checks in __kmap_local_sched_{in,out}\n\nWhen CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL is enabled __kmap_local_sched_{in,out} check\nthat even slots in the tsk-\u003ekmap_ctrl.pteval are unmapped. The slots are\ninitialized with 0 value, but the check is done with pte_none. 0 pte\nhowever does not necessarily mean that pte_none will return true. e.g.\non xtensa it returns false, resulting in the following runtime warnings:\n\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101 at mm/highmem.c:627 __kmap_local_sched_out+0x51/0x108\n CPU: 0 PID: 101 Comm: touch Not tainted 5.17.0-rc7-00010-gd3a1cdde80d2-dirty #13\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0xc/0x40\n __warn+0x8f/0x174\n warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0xac\n __kmap_local_sched_out+0x51/0x108\n __schedule+0x71a/0x9c4\n preempt_schedule_irq+0xa0/0xe0\n common_exception_return+0x5c/0x93\n do_wp_page+0x30e/0x330\n handle_mm_fault+0xa70/0xc3c\n do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x3c4\n common_exception+0x7f/0x7f\n\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101 at mm/highmem.c:664 __kmap_local_sched_in+0x50/0xe0\n CPU: 0 PID: 101 Comm: touch Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc7-00010-gd3a1cdde80d2-dirty #13\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0xc/0x40\n __warn+0x8f/0x174\n warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0xac\n __kmap_local_sched_in+0x50/0xe0\n finish_task_switch$isra$0+0x1ce/0x2f8\n __schedule+0x86e/0x9c4\n preempt_schedule_irq+0xa0/0xe0\n common_exception_return+0x5c/0x93\n do_wp_page+0x30e/0x330\n handle_mm_fault+0xa70/0xc3c\n do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x3c4\n common_exception+0x7f/0x7f\n\nFix it by replacing !pte_none(pteval) with pte_val(pteval) != 0.",
"id": "GHSA-v3gm-f9gf-wg97",
"modified": "2025-10-14T21:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-10-14T21:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49081"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66f133ceab7456c789f70a242991ed1b27ba1c3d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd5b3b97716a611fcf67d92fd2370fcb8d50372"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85550b0f5fa5dd3c30469ea702c44444ef242c83"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c21d040de6225414547d9bd31cd200f290991c85"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.