ghsa-v35g-wxj7-gxp3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:12
Modified
2022-05-13 01:12
Details
Apache Tomcat through 7.0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via partial HTTP requests, as demonstrated by Slowloris.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-5568", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-11-30T19:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Apache Tomcat through 7.0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via partial HTTP requests, as demonstrated by Slowloris.", id: "GHSA-v35g-wxj7-gxp3", modified: "2022-05-13T01:12:13Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:12:13Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5568", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880011", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80317", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://captainholly.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/slowloris-vs-tomcat", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-12/msg00089.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-12/msg00090.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00037.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/26/2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/How-does-Tomcat-handle-a-slow-HTTP-DoS-tc2147776.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/How-does-Tomcat-handle-a-slow-HTTP-DoS-tc2147779.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56686", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.